“The record of failure to predict recessions is virtually unblemished,” the IMF’s Prakash Loungani concluded in a 2001 study of private sector forecasts. That dismal record makes it all the more remarkable that one organization has constantly bucked the trend. According to The Economist, ECRI is “the only organization to give advance warning of each of the past three recessions; just as impressive, it has never issued a false alarm.”
What accounts for ECRI’s success? Banerji credits first and foremost the organization’s reliance on an elaborate system of leading indicators to predict turning points in the economy. This approach has often been belittled as “measuring without theory,” but Banerji went to some length to counter this assertion. He claimed that formal econometric models are not sufficiently flexible to capture turning points of the economic cycle—as illustrated by the work of two well-known econometricians. In the late 1980s, they created a sophisticated recession probability index, which immediately failed to predict the 1990 recession. Queried as to the reasons why the index had failed, one of the authors replied: “parameter drift.”
A better tool kit
Thus, a more robust approach was needed, as the correct projection of turning points of the business cycle could provide crucial information to policymakers and markets. Banerji insists that ECRI’s analysis lives up to this claim. Back in 1950, Geoffrey Moore—one of ECRI’s intellectual fathers—created eight leading indicators of revivals and recessions for the U.S. economy from 1870 to 1938. Forty years later, he repeated this exercise for various industrial countries in the second half of the 20th century. To Moore’s own surprise, he found that the leading indicators identified in 1950 were still holding up! That is, the same indicators that forecast turning points in the post-Civil War U.S. economy worked also for late 20th century Germany, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, and the United States itself.
Staying the course
Away from the academic mainstream, Moore and a small band of researchers have stayed their course for decades, refining the scope and accuracy of their forecasting tools. Rather than relying on one-dimensional leading indicators, today most ECRI projections are based on a long index, a weekly leading index, and a short-term index. When the business cycle turns, these indices turn sequentially, providing increasing confidence about where the economy is headed.
This refined approach has permitted ECRI to make correct calls even when everybody else went wrong. For example, in March 2001, 95 percent of U.S. economists forecast that there would not be a recession, while ECRI emphasized that a recession was unavoidable. At mid-June, ECRI’s analysis pointed to a slowing of U.S. growth, even though a slight uptick in the long index gave some reason for hope of a reacceleration. Also, ECRI produces separate leading indicators for growth, inflation, and employment. As a consequence, its projections can better handle nonstandard phenomena, such as the recent jobless recovery or inflation-free growth.
The full transcript of the June 23 book forum is available on the IMF’s website (www.imf.org). Beating the Business Cycle: How to Predict and Profit from Turning Points in the Economy, by Lakshman Achuthan and Anirvan Banerji, is published by Doubleday and Company.