Back Matter

Back Matter

Author(s):
James Daniel
Published Date:
August 2006
Share
  • ShareShare
Show Summary Details

Bibliography

    AhmadEhtisham and JonCraig1997“Intergovernmental Transfers,” in Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practiceed. by TeresaTer-Minassian (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    AlesinaAlberto and RobertoPerotti1997“Fiscal Adjustments in OECD Countries: Composition and Macroeconomic Effects,”Staff Papers International Monetary FundVol. 44 (June) pp. 21048.

    AllenMarkChristophRosenbergChristianKellerBradSetser and NourielRoubini2002“A Balance Sheet Approach to Financial Crisis,”IMF Working Paper 02/210 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    BaerKatherineOlivierBenon and JuanToro2002Improving Large Taxpayers’Compliance: A Review of Country ExperienceIMF Occasional Paper No. 215 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    BaldacciEmanueleAryeHillman and NaokoKojo2004“Growth, Governance, and Fiscal Policy Transmission Channels in Low-Income Countries,” in Helping Countries Develop: The Role of Fiscal Policy (Washington: International Monetary Fund) pp. 67104.

    BarrNicholas2002The Pension Puzzle: Prerequisites and Policy Choices in Pension DesignIMF Economic Issues No. 29 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    BaunsgaardThomas2001“A Primer on Mineral Taxation,”IMF Working Paper 01/139 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    BernankeBenJ.1983“Irreversibility, Uncertainty and Cyclical Investment,”Quarterly Journal of EconomicsVol. 98No. 1 pp. 85106.

    BrunoMichael and WilliamEasterly1998“Inflation Crises and Long-Run Growth,”Journal of Monetary EconomicsVol. 41 pp. 326.

    BulířAleš and JavierHamann2001“How Volatile and Unpredictable Are Aid Flows, and What Are the Policy Implications?”IMF Working Paper 01/167 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    BulířAleš and TimothyLane2004“Aid and Fiscal Management,” in Helping Countries Develop; The Role of Fiscal Policyed. by SanjeevGuptaBenedictClements and GabrielaInchauste (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    ChalkNigelA. and RichardHemming2000“Assessing Fiscal Sustainability in Theory and Practice,”IMF Working Paper 00/81 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    ChalkNigelA.2002“Structural Balances and All That: Which Indicators to Use in Assessing Fiscal Policy,”IMF Working Paper 02/101 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    CoelhoIsaiasLiamEbrill and VictoriaSummers2001“Bank Debit Taxes in Latin America: An Analysis of Recent Trends,”IMF Working Paper 01/67 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    CorbachoAna and HamidDavoodi2004“Expenditure Issues and Governance in Central America,” in The Macroeconomy of Central Americaed. by RobertRennhack and EricOfferdal (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    CroceEnzo2002“Assessment of the Fiscal Balance,” in Macroeconomic Management Programs and Policiesed. by MohsinKhanSalehNsouli and Chorng-HueyWong (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    Dabla-NorrisEra and PaulWade2002“The Challenge of Fiscal Decentralization in Transition Countries,”IMF Working Paper 02/103 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DanielJames1997“Fiscal Aspects of Bank Restructuring,”IMF Working Paper 97/52 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DanielJames2003“Hedging Government Oil Risk,” in Fiscal Policy Formulation and Implementation in Oil-Producing Countriesed. by JeffreyDavisRolandoOssowski and AnnalisaFedelino (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DanielJamesJeffreyM.Davis and AndrewM. Wolfe1997“Fiscal Accounting of Bank Restructuring,”IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment 97/5 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DanielJames and MatthewSaal1997“Macroeconomic Impact and Policy Response,” in Systemic Bank Restructuring and Macroeconomic Policy”ed.byWilliamE. AlexanderJeffreyM. DavisLiamP. Ebrill and Carl-JohanLindgren (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DavisJeffreyM. and others2000Fiscal and Macroeconomic Impact of Privatization IMF Occasional Paper No. 194 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DavisJeffreyM.RolandoOssowskiJamesDaniel and StevenBarnett2003“Stabilization and Savings Funds for Nonrenewable Resources: Experience and Policy Implications in Fiscal Policy Formulation and Implementation in Oil-Producing Countriesed. by JeffreyDavisRolandoOssowski and AnnalisaFedelino (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DavisJeffreyM.Rolando Ossowski and AnnalisaFedelinoeds.2003Fiscal Policy Formulation and Implementation in Oil-Producing Countries (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DavoodiHamidErwinTiongson and SawitreeAsawanuchit2003“How Useful Are Benefit Incidence Analyses of Public Education and Health Spending?”IMF Working Paper 03/227 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    DornbuschRudiger1980Open Economy Macroeconomics (New York: Basic Books).

    DrummondPaulo and AliMansoor2002“Macroeconomic Management and the Devolution of Fiscal Powers,”IMF Working Paper 02/76 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    EasterlyWilliam and SergioRebelo1993“Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth,”Journal of Monetary EconomicsVol. 32 pp. 41758.

    EasterlyWilliamCarlosA. Rodriguez and KlaussSchmidt-Hebbel1994Public Sector Deficits and Macroeconomic Performance (New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank).

    EasterlyWilliam and StanleyFischer2001“Inflation and the Poor,”Journal of Money Credit and BankingVol. 33 (May) pp. 16078.

    EbrillLiamP.Reint Gropp and JanetG. Stotsky1999Revenue Implications of Trade LiberalizationIMF Occasional Paper No. 180 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    EbrillLiamP. and others2001The Modern VAT (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    FischerStanley1993“The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth,”Journal of Monetary EconomicsVol. 32 (December) pp. 485512.

    FouadManalRichardHemmingDavideLombardo and WojciechMaliszewski2005“Fiscal Transparency and State-Owned Banks,” in The Future of State-Owned Financial Institutionsed. by G.CaprioJ.FiechterR.Litan and M.Pomerleano (Washington: Brookings Press) pp. 7592.

    GhoshAtish and StevenPhillips1998“Warning: Inflation May Be Harmful to Your Growth,”Staff PapersInternational Monetary FundVol. 45 (December) pp. 672710.

    GhoshAtishTimothyLaneMarianneSchulze-GhattasAlešBulířJavierHamann and AlexMourmouras2002IMF-Supported Programs in Capital Account Crises: Design and ExperienceIMF Occasional Paper No. 210 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    GhoshAtishTimothyLaneCharalambosChristofidesJunKimLauraPapiUmaRamakrishnanAlunThomas and JuanZalduendo2005The Design of IMF-Supported ProgramsIMF Occasional Paper No. 241 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    GlewwePaul2002“Schools and Skills in Developing Countries,”Journal of Economic LiteratureVol. 40No. 2 pp. 43682.

    GuptaSanjeevKennethMiranda and IanParry1995“Public Expenditure Policy and the Environment: A Review and Synthesis,”World DevelopmentVol. 23 (March) pp. 51528.

    GuptaSanjeev and others2000aEquity and Efficiency in the Reform of Price Subsidies: A Guide for Policymakers (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    GuptaSanjeev and others2000bSocial Issues in IMF-Supported Programs IMF Occasional PaperNo. 191 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    GuptaSanjeevHamidDavoodi and ErwinTiongson2001“Corruption and the Provision of Health Care and Education Services,” in The Political Economy of Corruptioned. by ArvindK.Jain (London: Routledge).

    GuptaSanjeevKeikoHonjo and MarijnVerhoeven2001“The Effectiveness of Government Expenditures: Experiences from Africa,”Journal of Policy ModelingVol. 23No. 4 pp. 43367.

    GuptaSanjeevLuizde Mello and RajuSharan2001“Corruption and Military Spending,”European Journal of Political EconomyVol. 17 pp. 74977.

    GuptaSanjeev and others2002Is the PRGF Living Up to Expectations? IMF Occasional PaperNo. 216 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    GuptaSanjeevMarijnVerhoeven and ErwinTjongson2003“Public Spending on Health Care and the Poor,”Health EconomicsVol. 12Issue 8 (August) pp. 68596.

    GuptaSanjeev and others2003b“Transition Economies: How Appropriate Is the Size and Scope of Government?”Comparative StudiesVol. 45No. 4 pp. 55476.

    GuptaSanjeev and others2003a“Foreign Aid and Revenue Response: Does the Composition of Aid Matter?” in Helping Countries Develop: The Role of Fiscal Policy (Washington: International Monetary Fund) pp. 385406.

    GuptaSanjeevBenedictClements and ErwinTiongson2004“Foreign Aid and Consumption Smoothing: Evidence from Global Food Aid,”Review of Development EconomicsVol. 8Issue 3 (August) pp. 37990.

    GuptaSanjeevBenedictClements and GabrielaInchausteeds.2004Helping Countries Develop: The Role of Fiscal Policy (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    GuptaSanjeev and others2004“The Persistence of Fiscal Adjustments in Developing Countries,”Applied Economic LettersVol. 11 (March 15) pp. 20912.

    GuptaSanjeevRobertPowell and YongzhengYang2005“The Macroeconomic Challenges of Scaling Up Aid to Africa,”IMF Working Paper 05/179 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    GuptaSanjeev and others2005a“Fiscal Policy, Expenditure Composition, and Growth in Low-Income Countries,”Journal of International Money and FinanceVol. 24Issue 3 (April)pp.44163.

    GuptaSanjeev and others2005b“What Sustains Fiscal Consolidations in Emerging Market Countries?”International Journal of Finance & EconomicsVol.10 (October) pp. 30721.

    HarrisonGraham and RussellKrelove2005“VAT Refunds: A Review of Country Experience,”IMF Working Paper 05/218 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    HellerPeter1974“Public Investment in LDCs with Recurrent Cost Constraint: The Kenyan Case,”Quarterly Journal of EconomicsVol. 88 pp. 25172.

    HellerPeter1979“The Underfinancing of Recurrent Development Costs,”Finance and DevelopmentVol. 16 (March) pp. 3841.

    HellerPeter2002“Considering the IMF’s Perspective on a Sound Fiscal Policy,”IMF Policy Discussion Paper 02/8 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    HellerPeter2003Who Will Pay? Coping with Aging Societies Climate Change and Other Long-Term Fiscal Challenges (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    HellerPeter2005a“Understanding Fiscal Space,”IMF Policy Discussion Paper 05/4 (Washington: International Fund).

    HellerPeter2005b“Pity the Finance Minister: Issues in Managing a Substantial Scaling-Up of Aid Flows,”IMF Working Paper 05/180 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    HemmingRichard2003“Policies to Promote Fiscal Discipline,”paper presented at the Conference on Political Economy of Policy Transfer, Learning, and Convergence, Tulane UniversityApril 11–12.

    HemmingRichard2004“Promoting Fiscal Discipline,”paper presented at APEC Deputies Meeting, SantiagoSeptember.

    HemmingRichardMichaelKell and SelmaMahfouz2000“The Effectiveness of Fiscal Policy in Stimulating Economic Activity—A Review of the Literature,”IMF Working Paper 02/208 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    HemmingRichard and MurrayPetri2000“A Framework for Assessing Fiscal Vulnerability,”IMF Working Paper 00/52 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    International Monetary Fund1986A Manual on Government Finance Statistics (Washington).

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department1997Guidelines for Fiscal Adjustment IMF Pamphlet SeriesNo. 49 (Washington).

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department1997“IMF Adopts Guidelines Regarding Governance Issues,”IMF SurveyVol. 26No. 15August 15.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2001aGovernment Finance Statistics Manual (Washington).

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2001bManual on Fiscal Transparency (Washington). Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/manual/index.htm.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2002Fiscal Dimensions of Sustainable Development IMF Pamphlet SeriesNo. 54 (Washington).

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2003“Public Debt in Emerging Markets: Is It Too High?”World Economic Outlook September 2003 World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington).

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Departmentforthcoming Promoting Fiscal Discipline (Washington).

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2004a“Public Investment and Fiscal Policy” (Washington). Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/2004/pifp/eng/pifp.pdf.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2004b“Rebuilding Fiscal Institutions in Post-Conflict Countries” (Washington). Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/2005/022505.htm.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2004c“IMF Discusses Operational Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries,”IMF Press Information Notice No. 04/119. Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pn/2004/pn04119.htm.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2005a“Dealing with the Revenue Consequences of Trade Reform” (Washington). Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/021505.pdf.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2005b“The Macroeconomics of Managing Increased Aid Inflows—Experiences of Low-Income Countries and Policy Implications” (Washington).Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/080805a.pdf.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2005c“Review of PRGF Program Design—Overview” (Washington).Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/080805r.htm.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department2005d“Monetary and Fiscal Policy Design Issues in Low-Income Countries” (Washington). Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/080805m.pdf.

    International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department and World Bank2001Guidelines for Public Debt Management (Washington).

    International Monetary Fund Independent Evaluation Office2003“Evaluation of Fiscal Adjustment in IMF-Supported Programs” (Washington). Available via the Internet: http://www.imf.org/External/NP/ieo/2003/fis/index.htm.

    IvanovaAnnaMichaelKeenAlexanderKlemm2005“The Russian ‘Flat Tax’ Reform,”Economic Policy: A European ForumVol. 43 (July) pp. 397444.

    KeenMichael2003Changing Customs: Challenges and Strategies for the Reform of Customs Administration (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    KeenMichaelJennyLigthart2002“Coordinating Tariff Reduction and Domestic Tax Reform,”Netherlands Journal of International EconomicsVol. 56 (March) pp. 489507.

    KeenMichael and AlejandroSimone2004“Tax Policy in Developing Countries: Some Lessons from the 1990s, and Some Challenges Ahead,” in Helping Countries Develop: The Role of Fiscal Policyed. by SanjeevGuptaBenedictClements and GabrielaInchauste (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    KhanMohsinS. and AbdelhakS. Senhadji2001“Threshold Effects in the Relationship Between Inflation and Growth,”Staff Papers International Monetary FundVol. 48No. 1 pp. 121.

    KopitsGeorge and StevenSymansky1998Fiscal Policy RulesIMF Occasional PaperNo. 162 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    MackenzieGeorgeA. and PeterStella1996Quasi-Fiscal Operations of Public Financial Institutions IMF Occasional PaperNo. 142 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    MackenzieGeorgeA.DavidW.H. Orsmond and PhilipR. Gerson1997The Composition of Fiscal Adjustment and Growth: Lessons from Fiscal Reforms in Eight Economies IMF Occasional PaperNo. 149 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    MartinPhilippe and CarolAnn Rogers1997“Stabilization Policy, Learningby-Doing, and Economic Growth,”Oxford Economic PapersVol. 49No. 1 pp. 15266.

    McLureCharlesE.1999“Tax Holidays and Investment Incentives: A Comparative Analysis,”Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation pp. 32639.

    MintzJackM.1990“Corporate Tax Holidays and Investment,”The World Bank Economic ReviewVol. 4 (Washington: World Bank) pp. 81102.

    NorregaardJohn1997“Tax Assignment,” in Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practiceed. by Teresa Ter-Minassian (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    OrtizGuillermo2002Recent Emerging Market Crises: What Have We Learned? Per Jacobsson Foundation Lecture (Basel: Bank for International Settlements and Per Jacobsson FoundationJuly 7).

    PattilloCatherineHélènePoirson and LucaRicci2004Through What Channels Does External Debt Affect Growth? Brookings Trade Forum 2003ed.bySusanM. Collins and DaniRodrik (Washington: Brookings Institution Press) pp. 22978.

    PerottiRoberto1996Fiscal Consolidation in Europe: Composition Matters American Economic ReviewVol. 86 (May) pp. 10510.

    PetriMurray2003“Promoting Fiscal Transparency: The Complementary Roles of the IMF, Financial Markets, and Civil Society,”IMF Working Paper 03/199 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    PotterBarryH. and JackDiamond1999Guidelines for Public Expenditure Management (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    Prud’hommeRemy and AnwarShah2002“Centralization v. Decentralization: The Devil Is in the Details” (unpublished; Washington: World Bank).

    SargentThomas and NeilWallace1981“Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic,”Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly ReviewVol. 5No. 3.

    SchadlerSusan and others1995IMF Conditionality: Experience Under Stand-By and Extended Arrangements, Part I, Key Issues and FindingsIMF Occasional PaperNo. 128 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    SilvaniCarlos and KatherineBaer1997“Designing a Tax Administration Reform Strategy: Experiences and Guidelines,”IMF Working Paper 97/30 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    TanziVito1998“Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures,”Staff Papers International Monetary FundVol. 45 (December) pp. 55994.

    TanziVitoHowellZee1996“Fiscal Policy and Long-Run Growth,”IMF Working Paper 96/119 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    TanziVito2000“Tax Policy for Emerging Markets: Developing Countries,”IMF Working Paper 00/35 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    Ter-MinassianTeresaed.1997Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    Ter-MinassianTeresa1997“Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in a Macroeconomic Perspective: An Overview,” inFiscal Federalism in Theory and Practiceed. by Teresa Ter-Minassian (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    Ter-MinassianTeresaJonCraig1997“Control of Subnational Government Borrowing,” in Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practiceed. by Teresa Ter-Minassian (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    vonHagenJürgen1998“Budgeting Institutions for Aggregate Fiscal Discipline”(unpublished; Bonn: Center for European Integration StudiesFebruary).Available via the Internet: http://www.zei.de/download/zei_wp/B98-01.pdf.

    ZeeHowellH.2004Taxing the Financial Sector: Concepts Issues and Practices (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    ZeeHowellH.JanetG.Stotsky and EduardoLey2002“Tax Incentives for Business Investment: A Primer for Policy Makers in Developing Countries,”World DevelopmentVol. 30No. 9 pp. 1497516.

This broader definition of fiscal adjustment (compared with common usage equating fiscal adjustment with consolidation) reflects the increased emphasis on situations that warrant fiscal expansion.

Only a few references are included in the main text. The bibliography section provides a fuller listing.

If, however, the government “represses” financial markets by controlling domestic interestrates, more government borrowing will result in either higher inflation and low (evennegative) real interest rates or reduced financial intermediation—a reduction in the share of savings channeled through formal financial institutions to private investors. The quality of private investment suffers too: with credit rationed, governments typically end up choosing who gets credit and choosing less well than the market would.

Excess economic volatility can also cause irreversible losses in human capital—including through the effect of more frequent spells of unemployment on learning-by-doing opportunities—compounding the negative effect on growth (Martin and Rogers, 1997).

The initial stages of trade liberalization—which typically involve replacing nontariff barriers, such as quotas, with tariffs—tend not to be associated with revenue loss (IMF, 2005a). But many low-income countries seem to have had difficulty in replacing any revenue loss resulting from trade reform. Those that succeeded (1) sustained efforts, over several years, to broaden tax bases, including by improving revenue administration; (2) strengthened the domestic consumption tax system, through excise taxes and especially by a simple, broadbased, VAT; and (3) increased income taxes.

See Heller (2003) for a fuller discussion of long-term fiscal challenges.

More formally: CA=(SprivIpriv)+(SpubIpub), where CA is the external current account balan ce; Spriv, private sector savings; Ipriv, private sector investment; Spub, public sector savings;and Ipub, public sector investment. Spub - Ipub is a measure of the overall fiscal balance. The precise definition of each sector is critical (see Section III, What Makes Fiscal Adjustment Successful?).

The real exchange rate is the relative price of tradables (such as televisions) to nontradables (e.g., haircuts). A real exchange rate depreciation (appreciation) improves (worsens) the external current account by diverting resources from the nontradable (tradable) to the tradable (nontradable) sector.

Public sector wage increases could increase private sector wages by, for example, forming a benchmark for private sector wage increases or by raising the wage the private sector would need to offer to be competitive.

The Government Finance Statistics Manual 2001 is a reference volume for government finance statistics. It covers concepts, definitions, classifications, and accounting rules, and provides a comprehensive analytic framework within which to summarize and present fiscal data in a form appropriate for analysis, planning, and policy design.

In IMF publications, social security funds are normally classified with the level of government at which they operate. If the social security system is autonomous, with its liabilities perfectly matched with its assets (a defined contribution, or fully funded, scheme), it would be treated as part of the nonfinancial public sector.

The exact linkages are complex and depend on the specific accounting definitions. For example, including lending minus repayments “above the line” (unlike in GFSM 2001; see Box 2) would imply that the overall balance would not equal the change in the government’s net financial position.

While the terms cyclically adjusted and structural balances are often used interchangeably, structural balances refer to fiscal balances adjusted for deviations from benchmark levels of all economic variables with a significant fiscal impact (not just output).

These include taking into account changes in the composition of output when estimating the output gap, as well as relying on estimates of built-in elasticities, excluding the impact of discretionary measures.

The composition of liabilities can also be an important source of vulnerability (see Section I, Fiscal Adjustment to Reduce Vulnerability).

In algebraic terms: Δb=d+(rg)b,whereb is the ratio of government debt to GDP (with Δ indicating the change in the ratio from one year to the next); d, the primary deficit ratio to GDP; r, the real interest rate; and g, the growth rate of real GDP.

More sophisticated versions of the formula differentiate between domestic currency debt and foreign currency debt, while also taking into account non-debt-creating deficit financing (e.g., privatization receipts) and debt-creating items (such as the recognition of contingent liabilities), which are not captured in the deficit.

Absorptive capacity typically refers to limits on a country’s ability to use aid effectivelyowing to the quality of a country’s policies and institutions and lack of administrative capacity in the form of specific skills or, more generally, of insufficient human resources and physical conditions (infrastructure and equipment) for policy and program implementation.

Absorption in this context measures the extent to which aid engenders a real resourcetransfer through higher imports or through a reduction in domestic resources devoted to producing exports. If the incremental aid directly finances imports, or is in-kind aid, spending and absorption are equivalent.

Independent fiscal authorities are an alternative to numerical rules to depoliticize fiscal policy decisions, but devolving such authority can be politically difficult. Fiscal councils that provide independent analysis are a less politically difficult option, but they are less binding on policy.

Procedural rules aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and fiscal management. They typically require the government to commit up-front to a monitorable fiscal policy strategy, usually for a multiyear period, and to routinely report and publish fiscal outcomes and strategy changes.

Under both “zero-rating” and “exemption,” no tax is charged on sales; they differ, however, in that taxes paid on inputs are refunded under zero-rating but not under exemption.

A tax, duty, or fee that varies based on the value of the products, services, or property on which it is levied.

A schedular tax system disaggregates income into components such as labor income, dividends, and royalties and then separately applies tax rates and exemptions.

    Other Resources Citing This Publication